Ace8 is the modernization practice of AceMQ.24/7 support from AceMQ after go-live
Book an Assessment

Story

RabbitMQ in Kubernetes: configuring it for success.

An anonymized engagement example. The client is not named and no results are quoted.

AceMQ engineering team3 min readEngineer-reviewed

The short answer

A company ran RabbitMQ in Kubernetes in the same pods as its own application. When the application failed, sudden pod restarts disrupted RabbitMQ and complicated recovery. Simple changes to deployments and networking fixed it. Many RabbitMQ problems are really default-configuration misunderstandings. This is an anonymized example, not a verified case study.

Stacks we work in

  • RabbitMQ
  • Kubernetes
  • Docker
  • Java
  • Spring Boot
  • PostgreSQL
  • Kafka
  • Terraform
  • GitHub Actions
  • RabbitMQ
  • Kubernetes
  • Docker
  • Java
  • Spring Boot
  • PostgreSQL
  • Kafka
  • Terraform
  • GitHub Actions

Pattern

It is often not RabbitMQ itself

Many issues come from misunderstanding the default out-of-the-box configuration, whether it is a standalone install, a preconfigured Docker image or a Kubernetes deployment. Recurring themes are monitoring, management, high availability, quorum queues and performance characteristics.

Engagement

RabbitMQ and the application in the same pods

One company ran RabbitMQ in Kubernetes, co-resident in the same pods as its in-house application. We explained how sudden pod restarts, triggered whenever the application failed, could disrupt RabbitMQ and make recovery harder.

Simple changes to the deployments and networking were a quick win, and the team came away understanding how to run RabbitMQ properly in Kubernetes.

  • Run the broker as its own workload, not inside the application's pods.
  • Treat restarts as normal and plan for recovery.
  • Monitor the broker separately from the application.

Modernization

Link to modernization

Moving workloads to containers changes failure behavior. Check it step by step, as in the 8 principles. See Application modernization services and the documented American National case study.

After go-live

Keep it running after cutover.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Something else on your mind? Ask an engineer.

No. It is an anonymized engagement example. The documented case study is American National.

Start here

Know the cost before anything moves.

A fixed-price assessment gives you the inventory, the risk score and a phased plan. Scope and cost are fixed before the migration starts.

  • InventoryEvery application, its stack and what it depends on.
  • Risk scoreWhere a change is likely to break, ranked.
  • Phased planWhat moves first, which tools lead, and the fixed price.

Get in touch

Talk to a modernization engineer

Tell us what you run today. An engineer, not a sales script, replies within one business day.

305-204-2607info@ace8.io

66 W. Flagler St. 9th Floor
Miami, FL 33130

What are you moving off? *

Fixed price. Scope and cost before any migration starts.