Phased IBM MQ to RabbitMQ migration with legacy code refactoring
Delivered for American National, an insurer, in phases with no big-bang cutover. Closest regulated-sector reference.
Financial services
Banks and lenders need change they can audit. We work in small, tested, reversible steps and keep a record of every change.
The short answer
Legacy modernization in banking and financial services moves core and channel applications off unsupported runtimes and servers while keeping a clear audit trail. Ace8 changes code in small tested slices, with AI-assisted tools for the repetitive edits and a senior engineer signing each one. Every step is reversible, and results are recorded for review.
Context
Constraints
The technology is the same Java estate found elsewhere. The constraints are different.
Method
The principles are on the method page.
Inventory applications, runtimes, licence dates, open vulnerabilities and test coverage. Rank by risk and cost.
Add characterization tests around calculation, posting and reconciliation logic before any change.
Recipes and AI-assisted tools do the repetitive edits. Engineers review each diff.
Run old and new side by side where the design allows, compare outputs, then move traffic gradually.
Document the change record and arrange support for the new stack.
Scope
Scope limits
Ace8 works on enterprise Java applications and the middleware around them. We do not migrate mainframe COBOL, replace core banking platforms or provide regulatory advice. If an engagement needs those, we say so in the assessment.
Related work
The closest delivered work is the insurance project: the AceMQ engineering team moved American National from IBM MQ to RabbitMQ in phases while refactoring dependent legacy code. It shows the phased, reversible approach in a regulated business. We do not yet have a named bank or lender reference to publish, and we will not imply one. Read the American National case study or the insurance page.
Proof
Delivered for American National, an insurer, in phases with no big-bang cutover. Closest regulated-sector reference.
Moving banking applications off unsupported runtimes, servers and middleware onto supported platforms, in controlled steps and with an audit trail. It is usually done application by application rather than by replacing the core.
We produce change records, reviewer sign-off, before and after test results and rollback plans. Your audit and risk teams decide whether that meets your obligations.
No. We modernize enterprise Java applications and the messaging around them. Core platform replacement is outside our scope.
By staging cutovers: old and new run side by side where possible, outputs are compared, and traffic moves gradually with a rollback ready.
We have a delivered insurer reference through the AceMQ engineering team. We have no named bank reference to publish yet.
A fixed-price assessment gives you the inventory, the risk score and a phased plan. Scope and cost are fixed before the migration starts.
Book a Fixed-Price AssessmentGet in touch
Tell us what you run today. An engineer, not a sales script, replies within one business day.